Please put Sodium Fluoride in batteries not in kids.

Not all fluoride is the same Sodium Fluoride and Calcium Fluoride are not the same thing. The Sodium Fluoride they put in my water when I was a child, was a neurotoxin. Then they forced me to take Risperdal. So now I collect SSI because I have neurological damage, that makes it , so I don't make enough to pay my electric bill. Please put Sodium Fluoride in batteries not in kids.

Autism Appreciation

Until they actually start taking us seriously and treat us like we matter as people instead of focusing on research in solving or accepting us as if we where the problem, I won't support any charity. Lets not forget who the charity case is now. They can't tell me there is not enough money anymore, not will Health and Welfare continues to waste money poisoning children and people like me. Couldn't I somehow be included in receiving research money? I have an AS degree, are they telling me it is to hard to at least include me in a population that gets to eat on a regular basis? Also are they trying to tell me disabled people deserve to beg and plead and face various forms of abuse for every little thing they get?

What Really Causes Mass Killings?

I was skeptical of research linking Autism to mass killings. Obviously this research should not be funded by any sort of reasonable advocacy group. First off I see obvious charity abuse simply in the act of doing a study to try and link Autism to mass murder. The profound effort to over diagnose the condition paired with the questionable logic of combining it with other condition and ultimately ignoring the background environment of the overall situation lead me to wonder, what researchers where really trying to tell the public? Do they feel threatened by the deaths of pears? Do they know how the department of defense has been funding black operations with charity money that was supposed to help people with Autism? Are they afraid they might end up accused of murder like so many other people close to Autism charities? I looked closely at a sample of 20 mass killings starting with the Virginia Tech Shooting. All of the shootings correlated to charities raising money for research. Most of the shootings correlated to research of Autism, brain injury, and pheromones. Most if not all the shootings were in places where Rockefeller s directed charity money. So why the Autism link? They totally made it up! Seung-Hui Cho's diagnosis could not be confirmed, also Bob Wright of Autism Speaks had media connections at NBC where Cho sent his video and at Fox where they interviewed his aunt. Don't forget about James Holmes and his neuroscience work. We can certainly confirm, he researched both Autism and mitochondrial disease. The Autism diagnosis came from mourning Joe who admitted in his apology that he had been working with Autism Speaks since 2005. No real doctor has diagnosed James Holmes with Autism. So we have Adam Lanza, the first "shooter" with confirmed Autism, but was he really the shooter? Autism Speaks was ready to collect money for victims the day of the shooting, able to control the media and looking for brain samples to confirm the GMO mouse research James Holmes was involved in. It seems far more likely that Adam was set up, to rid his father of parental responsibility, or to gain his brain for research. Also, how common is Autism really? If we look at those who died in Sandy Hook 1 in 9 had confirmed Autism. So it is well within reason to say there is no statistical link at all between confirmed Autism and mass killings. Also there is clearly a significant link to fund raising and research that should not be ignored. Who is killing researchers? Is mind control real? Are these events being faked? Where is charity money going? http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359178914000305 My research http://maryamericanidiot.blogspot.com/

Even Ferengis Have Better Ethics Than Mainstream Charities

They tell me these things cost money and try to imply that there just is not enough to go around, but I get so many things that cost a lot of money that I just don't need. Charities waste huge amounts of money on excessively expensive products. Not only did Autism Speaks waste $250 for tracking devices with a FOB value of around $2.50, but they also wasted huge amounts of money marketing the devises. They even lost a 14 year old with Autism and created Avonte's law, to add alarms to school doors provably expensive new ones. Why are they spending so much more than they have too? The third rule of acquisition says "Never spend more for an acquisition than you have to." funneling money for the disabled into expensive marketing and extremely overpriced products, is not whats best for anyone. http://www.inquisitr.com/1756160/autism-speaks-donates-98000-00-to-project-lifesaver/ http://en.memory-alpha.org/wiki/Rules_of_Acquisition http://www.autismspeaks.org/news/news-item/sen-schumer-avonte039s-mother-show-support-autism-speaks-dc

Service Animals

It's a great idea, Smokey walked right in and volunteered to be my service cat, for only the cost of cat food. but I am a disabled and we are still fighting hard to get the right to have things like food and housing without draining resources from family and friends. All this money goes in, why should I ever go hungry or have to be homeless, or give away my pet cat Smokey, because I have to fight the grocery store, just to have equal access to my own home, where I pay rent? I have given away at least 17 wonderful cats, because I just don't have the means to take care of any of them. Now, yet again someone has said meow and purred their way into my heart, yes yet another pregnant cat, I can't let her starve this a poor neighborhood. When people in my neighborhood move it's often because they can't afford to pay rent, not because they have another place to go. Even people in more stable situation go around begging and borrowing pet food. I tried to explain to Duchess Rose Von Fürberger that my expenses significantly exceed my income, but she insists the can of tuna from the food bank is for her, and I am beginning to wonder if unlabeled corn in some of this tuna, is not contributing to the autoimmunity that makes it so hard for some of us to gain weight and stay healthy. When David died he was so skinny he looked like a concentration camp victim. They tried hard to keep weight on him, they gave him weight gain shakes but he stayed frighteningly thin. He could not say what was wrong, he went under a raft and drowned, when I was only 14. To me food with even a small amount of contamination seems to take more then it gives, causing malnutrition, rashes and thyroid problems. It aggravates my sensory disorder making it significantly harder to do basic tasks and tolerate noise. Cheep Cat food is so contaminated I should not even have it around, so I feed Duchess Rose Von Fürberger contaminated meat from the food bank instead. How can I support animal? I feel like I have to be a significant burden on others just to get what I need.

Rule Number 7 Violations May Disinherited Rockefeller Heirs

One might argue that this old set of rules is invalid, because it is so old. However this contract is becoming invalid based on a higher math law and the Rockefeller s fortune is eating itself. The system that produces the vast Rockefeller empire must support itself completely or it loses what is not supported. This is seen in the form of workers doing counterproductive work, or even growing-up entirely unable to work. At first Rockefeller was able to simply acquire land and sell what was on it. However this proved to be very unhealthy for workers. Toxic stuff is heavy and naturally sinks below the ground. It turns out humans were simply best suited to live above ground and work with plants and animals. As proved over the course of a hundred years, humans are simply more suited for above ground environments, with plants, animals, and sun. At first it may not have been obvious, but over time, we see it was not benevolent to do research on the products deep below the Earth. "7. It is understood that at least Twenty Per cent (20%) of the allowance shall be used for benevolences." Unethical human research has become a significant waste of human resources that were clearly supposed to be used "for benevolences." as part of this agreement from 1920. Many many unsafe products have been brought to market and promoted simply because they where profitable, without serious consideration for the damages these products could do, or if they had real value. They ask for money in the names of Autistic people, yet somehow there is so little I have to file for extra grants, just to get bus tickets and phone services, in places that are not accessible to me? I am a creature that came from a garden, I need a place where I can live and grow what I need. I am sick of depending on benevolences, that somehow always seems to end up in the sale of some overpriced toxic waste, usually paid for through "benevolences" and given to an unsuspecting poor person, sometimes without their consent. What can I do, when my sensory system has gone haywire due to unwanted "benevolence"? I can now hear the sounds of "benevolent" marketing campaigns so loudly and painfully it seems to be affecting my speech. I myself am proof of how much damage this so called benevolence is doing. Read more: http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/who-wants-to-be-a-billionaire-2996641/#J0DU7LrIjJRIG4eC.99 Give the gift of Smithsonian magazine for only $12! http://bit.ly/1cGUiGv Follow us: @SmithsonianMag on Twitter http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/who-wants-to-be-a-billionaire-2996641/?no-ist

The Importance of Disclaimers in Socialization.

Disclaimers are words you use when you are uncertain. Always put a disclaimer at the end of every sentence sometimes. People like to know if someone is going to do something they say they will do. Statements of intention may have little or no relevance to actual accomplishments or actions. Some people just have a tendency to cause confusion by stating what they intend to do in absolute terms, when their intention are unrelated to their actions. Example: I will get the house clean today. Better: I will provably get the house clean today. I might get the house clean today. I want to get the house clean today. The disclaimers in the sentences like "provably", "might", "want" help let people that I will look at the mess become overwhelmed and go back to bed. Others may fail to use disclaimers, but this is simply a minor social error, not a crime. Suggest disclaimers for friends who have poor abilities to predict their own behavior.